โครงการความร่วมมือด้านทร้พย์สินทางปัญญาระหว่างอาเซียน-สหภาพยุโรป (ARISE Plus IPR) เป็นหนึ่งในองค์ประกอบ ภายใต้โครงการการรวมตัวทางเศรษฐกิจระด้บภูมิภาคอาเซียนจากสหภาพยุโรปเพิ่มเติม (ASEAN Regional Integration Support from the EU หรือ ARISE Plus) โครงการ ARISE Plus IPR ซึ่งเป็นโครงการระยะเวลาห้าปี มูลค่า 5.5 ล้านย่โร สน้บสนุน การรวมต้วระดับภูมิภาคผ่านความร่วมมือด้านทร้พย์สินทางปัญญา และมีเป้าหมายในการยกระด้บระบบทร้พย์สินทางปัญญา เพื่อสร้าง คุ้มครอง ใช้ประโยชน์ บริหาร และบ้งค้บใช้ ตามแนวปฏิบ้ติที่ดีที่สุดและตามมาตรฐานสากล รวมถึงวัตถุประสงค์เชิง กลยุทธ์ของแผนปฏิบ้ติการทรัพย์สินทางปัญญาของอาเซียน (ASEAN IPR Action Plan) 2559-2568

This open access book is the outcome of a Global Forum on Innovation, Intellectual Property and Access to Medicines held in December 2019 at the Max Plank Instititute in Munich, organised by the South Centre and the Max Plank Institute. The academics and experts from international organisations participating have contributed chapters to this book. The book is for policy makers (in Ministries of Health, Ministries of Trade, Ministries of Foreign Affairs, patent offices), but also relevant for academics (law, trade, public health), on the flexibilities available in the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) of the World Trade Organization to promote access to medicines.

The private international law of intellectual property is currently much debated both in Europe and abroad. Art. 8 of the Rome II Regulation of 2007, which codifies a territorial approach for the infringement of intellectual property, has provoked an intensive discussion in Europe as to whether the lex loci protection is still appropriate for intellectual property litigation in the age of worldwide networks. A condensed outcome of this debate is summarized in the »Principles for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property« (CLIP Principles) drafted by the European Max Planck Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property (CLIP), published recently in a second preliminary draft. On the international scale, the American Law Institute's »Intellectual Property: Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Judgments in Transnational Disputes« of 2007 (ALI Principles) are the focal point of the debate. A Japanese project (»Transparency Proposal«) was finalized in 2009. This volume provides a comparative analysis of the three proposals. It compiles papers presented at an international conference held in Tokyo in May 2009.

A movement emerges to challenge the tightening of intellectual property law around the world.At the end of the twentieth century, intellectual property rights collided with everyday life. Expansive copyright laws and digital rights management technologies sought to shut down new forms of copying and remixing made possible by the Internet. International laws expanding patent rights threatened the lives of millions of people around the world living with HIV/AIDS by limiting their access to cheap generic medicines. For decades, governments have tightened the grip of intellectual property law at the bidding of information industries; but recently, groups have emerged around the world to challenge this wave of enclosure with a new counter-politics of “access to knowledge” or “A2K.” They include software programmers who took to the streets to defeat software patents in Europe, AIDS activists who forced multinational pharmaceutical companies to permit copies of their medicines to be sold in poor countries, subsistence farmers defending their rights to food security or access to agricultural biotechnology, and college students who created a new “free culture” movement to defend the digital commons. Access to Knowledge in the Age of Intellectual Property maps this emerging field of activism as a series of historical moments, strategies, and concepts. It gathers some of the most important thinkers and advocates in the field to make the stakes and strategies at play in this new domain visible and the terms of intellectual property law intelligible in their political implications around the world. A Creative Commons edition of this work will be freely available online.

The first part of this open access book sets out to re-examine some basic principles of trade negotiation, such as choosing the right representatives to negotiate and enhancing transparency as a cure to the public’s distrust against trade talks. Moreover, it analyses how the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) might impact on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership's (RCEP) IP chapter and examines the possible norm setters of Asian IP. It then focuses on the People's Republic of China's (PRC) trade and IP strategy against the backdrop of the power games between the PRC, India and the US. The second part of the book reflects on issues related to investor–state dispute settlement and its relationship with IP, such as how to re-calibrate the balance in international investment arbitration, and whether compulsory license of IP constitutes expropriation in India, the PRC and select ASEAN countries. The third part of the book questions and strives to improve some of the proposed IP provisions of CPTPP and RCEP and to redefine some aspects of international IP norms, such as: pre-grant patent opposition and experimental use exception; patent term extension; patent linkage and data exclusivity for the pharmaceutical sector; plant variety protection; pre-established damages for copyright infringement; and the restructuring of copyright limitations in the public interest. The open access edition of this book is available under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 licence on bloomsburycollections.com. Open access was funded by the Applied Research Centre for Intellectual Assets and the Law in Asia, School of Law, Singapore Management University.

This Handbook is designed for business people of ASEAN Member States, Australia and New Zealand. In aid of understanding, some examples have been provided, but these are mere illustrations and do not provide judgment and do not constitute commercial or legal advice. Views or conclusions may have also been expressed but these should NOT be taken as legal or commercial advice. Any part of the content of this publication (including images, graphics, trademarks or logos) is only intended for informational and educational and educational purpose only. The author and the ASEAN Secretariat have taken due diligence in the preparation of this publication. However, they shall not be held liable for any omissions or inaccuracies in the content of this publication. Neither the authors, the ASEAN Secretariat, Australian and New Zealand Governments accept any liability for any claims, loss or expenses that may arise or arising from use

Intellectual Property Branding in the Developing World identifies success stories in the areas of intellectual property (IP) and branding for non-technological innovation in the developing world. The author examines the relationship between IP, branding and innovation to demonstrate that innovation, in general, and non-technological innovation, in particular, must go hand in hand with branding. Branding of non-technological innovations should be a good strategic tool to be used by countries in the developing world mainly in the areas where they have competitive advantages.　 This book will assist scholars and academics dealing with innovation, branding, and IP issues, providing context and guidance to policymakers from the developing world. It is also relevant to researchers and students in the fields of intellectual property law, commercial law, international law, management, and innovation.

รวมกฎหมาย พระราชบัญญัติทรัพย์สินทางปัญญาที่แก้ไขปรับปรุง (เลือกอ่านแบบหน้าเดี่ยว ตัวหน้าสือจะขยาย อ่านได้สะดวก)